Frameworks Seal helps you meet
Regulatory and compliance frameworks Seal helps customers meet.
Seal's coverage and evidence model map naturally onto several regulatory and industry frameworks. The mapping below is a summary; the specific control mappings for each framework are available from your Seal account team on request.
FedRAMP
The United States federal government's authorization program for cloud services. Seal supports FedRAMP-relevant remediation by:
Producing sealed iterations of vulnerable packages without forcing version changes that would require re-authorization.
Publishing per-package attestations that satisfy continuous monitoring evidence requirements.
Meeting the 72-hour SLA on critical- and high-severity vulnerabilities, which aligns with FedRAMP's continuous-monitoring vulnerability response expectations.
PCI DSS 4.0
PCI DSS 4.0 requires remediation of high-severity vulnerabilities within defined windows. Seal supports PCI compliance by:
Closing high- and critical-severity vulnerabilities through sealed iterations rather than version changes that may break the cardholder-data environment.
Producing the per-package evidence (attestations, code diff, signing) auditors need to verify remediation.
Meeting the 72-hour SLA, which fits within PCI DSS 4.0's remediation windows for critical-severity findings.
DORA
The European Union's Digital Operational Resilience Act applies to financial entities. Seal supports DORA compliance by:
Providing the operational evidence (attestations, audit trails) that DORA's ICT third-party risk management requires.
Supplying sealed iterations of vulnerable open-source dependencies within timelines compatible with DORA's incident-response expectations.
NYDFS
The New York Department of Financial Services Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) requires covered entities to maintain a documented vulnerability management program. Seal supports NYDFS compliance by:
Producing evidence of remediation per vulnerability per package, signed and timestamped.
Closing critical- and high-severity findings within the 72-hour SLA.
How Seal helps in practice
For all of the above, the mechanics on Seal's side are the same: produce sealed iterations, publish the supporting evidence, sign every artifact. What varies is which framework's controls the evidence is being mapped to. The audit-ready traceability chapter walks through how the artifacts assemble into an audit narrative regardless of which framework you are answering to.
Related
Last updated